Pre-Conference 2
The economics of healthcare safety
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Learning Objectives
At the end of this program, participants will be able to:
- Describe the challenges related to the cost of unsafe care in Canada and
name ways the healthcare system can address public concerns
- Articulate lessons that healthcare can learn from other industries about
improving safety while reducing or maintaining costs
- Identify models for improving quality and safety used by other countries
that would be the best choice for the Canadian healthcare system
- Outline potential steps the healthcare system can take to ensure adequate
funding for safety without negatively affecting patient care
Thursday, October 21, 2010
0730 - 0815
Breakfast and Registration
0800 - 0805
Welcome and Opening Remarks
Steven
Lewis, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
0805 - 0940
WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?
What does the public think?
André Picard, Montréal, Québec
André Picard presents his view of the economics of healthcare safety, suggesting that the
problem is not the need for more money but for better managed care.
Assessing the economics of safer care
Ed Etchells, Toronto, Ontario
handout download
What do we know? In this presentation, Ed Etchells will present a brief review of the literature
and an estimate of the cost of unsafe care in Canada in 2010.
0940 - 1000
Break
1000 - 1130
LESSONS FROM OTHER INDUSTRIES
Lessons from aviation
Savik Ramkay, Toronto, Ontario
handout download
How does an organization take on a new program of developing a safety culture when
regulations are not yet in place? How do you convince investors that safety is more than best
practices? Is it cost avoidance or does it increase the bottom line as an expense? An industry
report and best practice story is a risk manager’s best friend when problem solving. Savik
Ramkay will break down examples, such as the Texas City Disaster and a ‘simple’ runway
overrun, to look at the workable lessons learned. Having worked with major airlines in Canada
at the Charter and Cargo areas as well as smaller specialty organizations and regional carriers,
Savik will describe the many lessons that can be shared about how each has become stronger
and more willing to continue the journey down the Safety Management System road. This
road ensures that the services they provide are delivered and that the employees are safe.
After all, it makes good business sense to be safe!
Lessons from High Reliability Organizations
Kathleen Sutcliffe, Ann Arbor, Michigan
handout download
A hallmark of High Reliability Organizations (HROs) is a well-developed safety culture that
gives safety higher priority than other organizational objectives. Thus, it is often assumed that
cost reductions are an enemy of high reliability. Safety in medicine, in contrast, is complicated
because medical harm tends to be individualized, distributed and insidious. Consequently,
other values, such as efficiency and cost control, typically receive higher priority than they
might otherwise. In recent years, efficiency and cost control have been elevated even further
and in some organizations consistently draw attention away from quality and safety. Balancing
the efficiency-cost imperative and safety in healthcare is a significant challenge. The purpose
of this presentation is to consider these issues and explore the implications using the lens of
High Reliability Organizational theory. Although studies specifically examining the economics
of High Reliability management are rare, the broader literature on HROs (particularly the
literature on safety culture and learning) provides insights that may be valuable to healthcare
providers, executives, and researchers.
1130 - 1245
Lunch
1245 - 1445
DIFFERENT COUNTRIES - DIFFERENT MODELS
Each of the three countries featured here reports uncontrolled and apparently uncontrollable
healthcare spending. Yet each country has also established ways to improve quality and safety.
In this session, we pose four questions for the presenters and participants:
- What is each country’s model for improving quality and safety?
- What does each country’s model offer that also saves money or limits spending?
- Will any (or all) of these three models actually save real dollars that can then be used for
something else, such as expanding previously deficient areas of healthcare or even for
spending in areas unrelated to healthcare, such as roads, education or paying down debt?
- Which of these options represents the best choice for Canadians?
The UK
Sir Michael Rawlins, London, United Kingdom
handout download
The USA
Blair Sadler, San Diego, California
handout download
Two Canadian views
Jim Hornell, Brandford, Ontario
handout download
1445 - 1515
BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER - FINDING ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS
- Question 1: Where should the money come from – taxes, subscription fees, or point-of-care user fees?
- Question 2: How much of GDP should we spend? Is there a limit? Does it matter? Are all populations equal in their needs?
- Question 3: Would the 10% solution really work? Force the system to adjust and see what happens.
- Question 4: Does the answer lie in wasting less?
- Question 5: Should we simply pay more?
1515 - 1530
Painting a picture for the public
André Picard, Montréal, Québec
1530 - 1600
Closing remarks
Steven Lewis, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
What to Expect at the Symposia
The Halifax Series has evolved into Canada's flagship event in healthcare safety. Participants from previous meetings have consistently remarked about the meeting being innovative, cutting edge, and intellectually challenging.
The meeting is different by design. In developing the early programs, the founders of the Halifax Series sought inspiration within healthcare and in other industries around the world for different ideas, knowledge, skills and attitudes which would present opportunities for the improvement of healthcare safety in Canada. The Halifax Series Organizing Committee has diligently continued this approach.